Brenda Sayers, Hupacasath First Nation, said: “We are deeply concerned about the Investor State (ISA) arbitration clause in the FIPPA of Canadian China, which will allow a foreign state group to sue Canada for anything that affects their profitability, including First Nations rights and title. These claims can be in the billions depending on the project. Currently, there are several proposed projects that could negatively affect FIPPA First Nations that are in conflict with the government. FiPPA`s ISA provisions will undermine the rights of the First Nation to protect its country and its resources or to make decisions that benefit or protect its people. In addition, the ISA will prohibit provincial and local governments from protecting their citizens. The constitutional rights of all will be at the mercy of corporate profits. The Council of Canadians described the FIPA agreement between Canada and China.  Hupacasath First Nation and other First Nations organizations indicated that there was Canada China FIPPA.  According to an article published by Osler in 2014, the agreement provides guarantees to Canadian investors in the Chinese economy. The article also stated that the agreement was one of The first investment agreements concluded by China with such comprehensive dispute settlement rules.  [Notes 3] [Notes 4] [Notes 5] This article states that in the event of a political reversal in a fragile country, investors are assured that foreign firms will be compensated in the same way as local firms, in order to avoid “expropriations adverse to the foreign investor”. The Government of Canada and the Government of the Republic of Poland recognize that the promotion and mutual protection of investments made by investors from one state in the other state stimulates enterprise initiative and the development of economic cooperation between the two states, known as “parties”: each party grants investors of the other party the free transfer of funds related to their investments. , initial capital, income, payments, etc. According to the Bank of France and UNCTAD, the inflow of French direct investment increased by 4 billion euros in 2015 to reach 33 billion euros.
Investments abroad for a domestic company provide access to new markets, resource conservation and the acquisition of new technologies. These agreements help to limit the risks of FDI, unstable legal institutions, possible expropriations and political instability. Discover new ways to expand your international presence. Canada`s broad (and growing) commercial network provides Canadian businesses with preferential access to various markets around the world. This page examines Canada`s Free Trade Agreement (FTA), Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreements (FIPA), multilateral agreements and World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements. Note: The texts of the treaty on this page are exclusively for information; the official texts of the treaties are published in the “Treaty of Canada” series. On September 9, 2012, Canada signed an agreement with China on the promotion and protection of foreign investment (“FOREIGN Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement”). IFIs are Canada`s name for bilateral investment contracts used by companies around the world to challenge public policies or community decisions that affect their profits. Canada`s first FIPA took the form of a single chapter (Chapter 11) of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Because of the extreme protection of NAFTA investments, Canada has contributed $160 million to the United States.