Written contracts are almost always preferable to oral contracts, as a written document helps resolve disputes over contractual terms. Oral contracts can also be difficult to apply in court. To avoid litigation and litigation, the best practice is to obtain a written agreement. The written contract allows all parties to understand their rights and obligations under the treaty. A company`s investment in its employees, customer relationships and confidential information is too valuable to face unfair competition. MacElree Harvey`s lawyers can help you check your non-competes and develop agreements tailored to your business needs. To agree on a consultation, contact Harry J. DiDonato at 610.840.0237, Robert A. Burke at 610.840.0211 or a member of our business law team. In California (and some other U.S. states), there are special circumstances regarding confidentiality agreements and non-compete clauses. California`s courts and legislatures have indicated that they value the mobility and entrepreneurship of a worker in general more than protectionist doctrines.   End-user licensing agreements are generally lengthy and written in very specific legal language, making it more difficult for the average user to give informed consent.
 When the company designs the end-user licensing agreement in such a way as to deliberately deter users from reading it and is difficult to understand, many users may not give their informed consent. 2. On the basis of the principles set out in paragraph 1, the parties enter into agreements for mutual recognition of certificates in the present circumstances. – the extension of the tax advantages granted by both parties as part of an international agreement or agreement to which it is bound; (b) the creation, where appropriate, of a legal framework to encourage investment, including through the conclusion of investment protection agreements and agreements to prevent double taxation by Morocco and member states. The applicability of an AEA depends on several factors, one of which is the court where the case is being tried. Some courts that have considered the validity of Shrinkwrap licensing agreements, some EULAs have been declared invalid and have been classified as liability contracts that are unacceptable and/or unacceptable under the U.C.C . see z.B Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology, Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd.
 Other courts have found that the shrinkw licensing agreement is valid and applicable: see ProCD, Inc.